Given that the machine is reflecting on the sensation of biased data, what makes us think that the machine can possibly be rational? We must consider that the rationality offered by these systems may be an illusion. But as Young points out, machine learning models are trained on biased data curated by humans, and not (as with the human brain) on the natural world: As with the human brain, it is thought that machine learning models are also blank slates until they are trained on data. In his important essay Tabula Rasa - Rethinking the Intelligence of Machine Minds, Young compares the untrained machine learning model to John Locke’s conception of the human mind as a “tabla rasa,” or “blank tablet.” As Young explains, Locke believed we develop rational knowledge from our experiences in the natural world. Not only can he explain the technical workings of machine learning models like GANs (generative adversarial networks), but he is also expert in sharing his philosophical views on AI and how these views impact his artistic practice. ” - Carl Jungĭavid Young is one of the most articulate artists working in the AI art space today. “ In addition to memories from a long-distant conscious past, completely new thoughts and creative ideas can… present themselves from the unconscious – thoughts and ideas that have never been conscious before. “ While rationalism would say that the machine learns emotions from the training data, romanticism instead poses that they are innate.” - David Young
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |